Computer Intuition

Are you suffering from an incurable disease?

A Computer program with ingenious intuition may save your life!

Question

 

Are you suffering from an incurable disease? Are you terminally ill? Did modern medicine give up on you? We might be able to help you.

 

Who Are We

 

We produce ingenious medical discoveries using a computer program called Computer Intuition. The program simulates the intuition of the greatest scientists in history, and turns our scientists into geniuses.

 

Proposal

 

Tell us about your problem, we will tell you if, and how we can help.  We will also tell you how much funding we need for producing a medical discovery that might reverse the course of your disease.

 

Background

 

Wouldn’t you wish to have Einstein working on your medical problem? Imagine someone with his ability to choose the right direction to work on, his talent to recognize meaningful findings, his genius to leap from old concepts to new and more promising ideas. Think how much you would accomplish with Einstein on your team.

Einstein and other great scientists had one overwhelming talent, their superb intuition. This talent led them to discover pathways not charted on any map, and ensured that these pathways would become highways traveled by generations of scientists in their expeditions to uncover the secrets of nature.

We believe that the above proposition is not merely wishful thinking. Our sophisticated computer program, called Computer Intuition, was modeled to show the characteristics of genius intuition, and therefore, to turns us into “Einsteins.”

The basic premise of the Computer Intuition program is that every future event is preceded by hints, and that the key to realizing these events is recognizing the future significance of these hints.

In 1996, Dr. Hanan Polansky completed a prototype of a computer program that analyzes scientific text and assigns a rating to all ideas found in the text. The rating can be interpreted as intuitive intensity, (or psychological intensity, hence, psytensity). The higher the intuitive intensity, or psytensity, of an idea, the more it hints on future discoveries or future treatments. Dr. Polansky modeled the program after the intuition of the greatest minds in science such as Einstein, Newton, Edison and Tesla, and called it Computer Intuition.

 

Consider the following figure.

 

 

The red line marks the volume of information available to a community of scientists/doctors on a certain subject, over time. The beginning of the line marks the "hints" period, and the end of the line the time where all the relevant information is known. The blue line marks the number of scientists/doctors that understood the true significance of the available information, over time. An average scientist/doctor will understand the true significance of the information when most of it is already known, see point 1. A brilliant scientist/doctor will appreciate its true significance when a small portion of it is known, see point 2. An "Einstein" will grasp its significance when only a few hints are available. This difference between the "Einstein" and the brilliant scientist/doctor when measured in time can be translated into years, even decades. Like the Einstein, with Computer Intuition, we will grasp the true significance of the scarcely available information much faster than anybody else.
 

In the last thirteen years, we used Computer Intuition in numerous applications. In all applications, we were faster than all other scientists/doctors working on the same problems in producing great discoveries.

 

First Prospective Application

 

The following is a description of a prospective application of Computer Intuition. In 1995, Professor Frederiksen published a paper entitled: Diagnostic Imaging in Dental Implantology in the scientific journal Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. At the time, Professor Frederiksen was regarded the world leading expert on the subject. To test the power of Computer Intuition, Professor Dov Almog and Professor Elliot Heisler from the University of Rochester devised the following test. Professors Almog and Heisler conducted a Medline search from 1980 to 1996 using relevant keywords. The search identified 34 papers.

The content of the papers were analyzed with Computer Intuition. The analysis identified three ideas. Two ideas were identical to the main conclusion in Frederiksen’s paper. The third idea suggested a new technology, not to be found in Frederiksen’s paper. The three ideas were published in 1996 by Professors Almog and Heisler in a paper entitled: Computer Intuition: Guiding Scientific Research in Imaging and Oral Implantology. The paper appeared in the Journal of Dental Research. (Reference 1)

How ingenious were the results? First, using Computer Intuition, Professors Almog and Heisler were able to duplicate the results by Professor Frederiksen, the world expert in the field, quickly and inexpensively. While it took Professor Frederiksen's decades to build his expertise, Professors Almog and Heisler became world experts on the subject within weeks.

 

Second, the Computer Intuition analysis proposed a new technology. How ingenious was this proposal? In 2006, Professor Almog, Professor Frederiksen, and four colleagues reviewed the academic and commercial practice of diagnostic imaging in oral implantology at the time. The review was published in the Journal of Oral Implantology. (Reference 2) In their review, the authors pointed to an interesting observation. Beginning in 2000, four years after the publication of the Computer Intuition study, “numerous companies from technology-transfer and commercial standpoint have introduced technology platforms that offer planning and guidance systems to facilitate dental implant placement procedures,” the same exact technology proposed by the Computer Intuition analysis.

To conclude, if we define being a genius as being able to grasp the future before everybody else, than Computer Intuition turned Professor Almog and Professor Heisler into geniuses, not merely world experts, but geniuses. (Note that, by being a co-author of the 2006 paper, Frederiksen, the world expert himself, seems to hint that he agrees with this assessment.)

Second Prospective Application

 

In another prospective application, Dr. Hanan Polansky used Computer Intuition to answer a fundamental question in biology. The answer was published in a book entitled: Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease." Since publication, several peer-reviewed journals have published glowing book reviews. The following is a selection of highlights from some of these reviews (the full text is posted, with permission from the journals, on the publisher’s website at http://www.cbcd.net/journals.htm):

 

Marc Pouliot, PhD - Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Canada


“First, I would like to congratulate the author for putting together such an insightful theory and impressive collection of supporting evidence, and most importantly, for being able to delineate functional links between seemingly distinct sets of observations. This is a well-organized, highly rigorous presented theory. The concept of microcompetition will change our approach in the study of chronic diseases and will furthermore give scientists a higher level of understanding in biology. Presentation of this concept undoubtedly provides a new set of opportunities for attacking chronic diseases. The idea that viruses are the cause of chronic diseases is not new, but the underlying mechanism, the evidence put forward, the molecular observations, the analyses, and conclusions certainly are. They lead the way to new approaches in chronic disease treatment. In my opinion, this book could be of great use to fundamental researchers. Investigators of specific areas will find well-presented concepts that transform our way of thinking about chronic diseases, and about the implication of viruses in biology and health in general. This work will eventually also have an impact on medical research and drug discovery, although realistically not in the near future; these areas not being typical bearers of new ideas. This is a very good theory, one that makes a lot of sense, and one that helps a lot in terms of trying to identify possible causes for chronic diseases. Time will tell, but regardless of being proved right or wrong, this theory has the merit of changing our current way of thinking, and this is probably the greatest contribution a new theory can bring.”

 

 (Published in the scientific journal "Cell Cycle")


Elena N. Naumova, PhD - Professor of Public Health and Family Medicine, Director of the NIH-sponsored Tufts Imitative for Forecasting and Modeling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Tufts University School of Medicine


“No student of biomedical sciences could ignore the appearance of a new theory offering explanations for the origin of chronic diseases. Systematic testing and better understanding of a framework outlined by such a theory may lead to a paradigm shift in scientific view on the nature of ‘health’ as well as causality of ‘disease’. To be honest, it took me three attempts to read this book. The first attempt resulted in frustration and confusion. The unusual writing style, complex terminology, and volume of information was daunting. I put the book aside, but the seeds of curiosity had been planted, and intriguing ideas took root. They began to grow, and soon I was forced to return to my reading. My second attempt was far more productive but nevertheless challenging. I went through all seven chapters of technical notes. It was a slow process, not because of the numerous mathematical equations (which were straightforward and well-supported) but because I found myself repeatedly distracted by independent thoughts and ideas triggered by the content of the book. I would read a sentence or two and immediately attach my own observations to the proposed frame, and test the fit; I was amazed by the serendipities. My third attempt was joyous; the book served its purpose - it made me think differently! What had first seemed like cumbersome technical notations became transparent when I connected them to the work I perform daily. I also realized that the area of my research interest - mathematical modeling of disease temporality - would benefit greatly by applying many fruitful ideas presented in Dr. Polansky’s book. I believe that Dr. Polansky’s book will catalyze the scientific learning process, promote interdisciplinary cross-fertilization, stimulate development of treatment strategies and drug discovery, and leave the reader inspired.”

 

(Published in the scientific journal "Archive of Virology")


Raxit J. Jariwalla, PhD , Laboratory of Viral, Immune and Malignant Diseases, California Institute for Medical Research

"Cancer is a complex, multi-step process. Although important advances have been made over the last 3 decades in understanding the genetic changes associated with cancer, the origin of the disease remains unknown. Now, a book by Hanan Polansky entitled “Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease” [1] provides a new perspective on the basic mechanism associated with the disruption underlying cancer. The book introduces a new theory derived from recognition of patterns in reported observations. The observations represent isolated dots, which when connected generate a pattern in full view, namely a theory that identifies the disruption and the sequence of subsequent genetic, cellular, and clinical events associated with cancer. Dubbed “microcompetition”, the theory propounds that foreign DNA can compete with cellular DNA for cellular transcription factors resulting in abnormal gene show abnormal gene transcription. A common source of foreign DNA discussed in the book is infection by a latent virus whose genome can persist indefinitely in cells. Several latent viral genomes have been associated with human cancer and latent infection was also found in other chronic diseases. The book derives numerous microcompetition based predictions and documents observations from a large number of studies consistent with the derived predictions. The book explains some puzzling observations in cancer research where genetic changes are not apparent around the control regions of dysregulated genes, and provides a mechanism for the action of latent viruses where expression of a viral protein is not readily detected. In explaining the relationship between latent viral infection and disease, the book introduces a new protein-independent paradigm, which is both logically congruent and empirically consistent with observations reported in an extensive number of studies performed under variety of experimental conditions."

 

(Published in the scientific journal "European Journal of Cancer")


Yvonne R. Thorstenson, PhD, Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University


"The origin of chronic disease is one of the most important and vexing questions in biomedical research today. Hope for ameliorating human suffering caused by these diseases is a strong motivator for government funding agencies. Yet, it is difficult to point to a breakthrough concept, though many have been trumpeted. We have been tempted with explanations for chronic disease: one day it is environmental toxins in the air or in our food, the next day it is inflammation or infection. All of these are important lines of investigation, and it is reasonable to trust that the cumulative bits of evidence from all different areas will eventually reveal a satisfying answer. But what if we are missing a critical piece? Isn’t it worthwhile to occasionally pause from our frenetic trajectory to consider possible alternative explanations? Maybe there is a path across the terrain that we didn’t notice before. Hanan Polansky’s book offers just such a thought provoking, mind-stretching opportunity. He provides a radically different perspective on the biomedical literature by applying a whole-system approach with mathematical models based on economic probability theory. Reading Polansky’s book was like a mini-sabbatical. It allowed me to step away from my narrow viewpoint, examine my biases, and emerge with an unmanageable number of new ideas to think about."

 

(Published in the scientific journal "BioEssay")


John A. Pickrell, PhD, Associate Professor, Environmental Toxicology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine

“When discussing instruction in higher education with professional colleagues, we think-but are not sure-that we know what will be required of tomorrow’s professional students. In reading this book, there arises a growing certainty, that tomorrow this theory’s knowledge will be required of today’s professional students. There is the sense that this book needs to be read, because we could learn valuable lessons and gain valuable perspectives. Enjoyment was irrelevant (and virtually nonexistent); however, it was nearly impossible to put it down! If most serious students try hard to understand Polansky’s theory, we will view health and environmental sciences in a whole new way. If most researches whose work involves chronic diseases read this and work to understand it, we’ll involuntarily begin to view and perhaps reshape our work through Dr. Polansky’s lenses. It is hard to see how much this theory will reshape our lives. On the chance that we may be seeing, inexactly, the face of future medicine, we should read the 543 pages of ‘Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Diseases,’ by H Polansky.”

 

(Published in the scientific journal "Veterinary and Human Toxicology")


 (Yurek) Jerzy K. Kulski, PhD - Professor, Division of Molecular Life Science, Department of Genetic Information, Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan and Associate Professor, Centre for Bioinformatics and Biological Computing, Murdoch University, Australia

“Having worked previously in a variety of research disciplines such as on the enzymology of phosphatases, endocrine regulation of reproductive biology and lactation, viruses and cancer, comparative genomics, immunogenetics and autoimmunity, I very much enjoyed the multidisciplinary aspects of the book. Hanan Polansky has connected the dots from various disciplines and revealed a compelling and unifying theory for the origin of chronic disease. His theory is well-supported by the reinterpretation of a considerable amount of published data. I particularly liked the way a number of different gene products, such as TF, CD18 and GABP, were used to integrate the different findings of cellular and molecular biology into a logical explanation of chronic disease. I found this book to be a fascinating read and I expect it will help me to reassess and resynthesize some of my own ideas and concepts about the origins of psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis. All together, the book adds clarity to a highly complex subject even though it may require some rereading and follow-up studies to fully benefit from this thought-provoking and ultimately essential account of the origin of chronic disease.” 

 

(Published in the scientific journal "Infection Genetics and Evolution")

 

In addition, many major universities around the world invited Dr. Hanan Polansky to present the discovery in seminars and workshops, including Stanford University, the University of California in San Francisco, and Rochester University. Recently, Dr. Polansky was invited to present his discovery in several seminars in Israel.

  • Central Virology Laboratory, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan - Host: Professor Ella Mendelson, PhD, Director of the Laboratory

  • Department of Virology, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Karem, Jerusalem - Host: Professor Amos Panet, PhD, Department Head

  • Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem - Host: Professor Tamar Peretz-Yablonski, Head of Institute

  • Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan - Host Professor Gideon Rechavi, Head of the Center

Also, Dr. Polansky's scientific work has been repeatedly reported on television, radio, newspapers and magazines.

In addition, 2008, patent offices around the world, including the Australian Patent Office, the Israeli Patent Office, and the United States Patent Office, possibly the patent office with the highest standard of proof in the world, examined the science in patents based on the discovery described in Dr. Polansky's book and decided to grant these patents.

Also, in 2008, polyDNA, LTD, an Israeli biotechnology company licensed these patents and developed a dietary supplement called Gene-Eden that reverses the effects of the disruption identified in the book. This product started selling successfully in Israel and the US in June 2009. Finally, the clinical results reported by the people who take the supplement confirm the discoveries made by the Computer Intuition analysis in the Origin of Chronic Disease study. Some of these clinical results were published in the journal Acta Oncologica.

This prospective application of Computer Intuition illustrates the power of the program. By knowing today what the rest of the profession will know tomorrow, we were able to develop a new biology of disease and a treatment that targeted this new biology and stopped the progression of a major disease.

 

Summary

Do you want a second chance on life? Let us develop the biology of your disease, and find a treatment to target this new biology.

 

Call us. It might save you life.

 

Contact

Biology of Disease

Phone: (USA) 585-563-3200

Phone: (Israel) 972-8-9361960

Email: info1@ComputerIntuition.com

 

 

References:

 

1. Almog DM, Heisler EM. Computer Intuition: guiding scientific research in imaging and oral implantology. J Dent Res. 1997 Oct;76(10):1684-9.

2. Almog DM, Benson BW, Wolfgang L, Frederiksen NL, Brooks SL. Computerized tomography-based imaging and surgical guidance in oral implantology. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(1):14-8. Review.

 


© 2010 All rights reserved